The clash between 'Doomers' and 'Boosters' in global discussions on the dangers of artificial intelligence has become one of the hot topics of the day. These two groups represent two completely opposing views on the future of artificial intelligence technology, which could have profound impacts on the economy and human life. While 'Doomers' point to the potential dangers posed by this technology, 'Boosters' emphasize its benefits and the necessity for rapid development.
Concerns of the 'Doomers'
The term 'Doomer' refers to individuals who predict that artificial intelligence may have catastrophic consequences for society. The history of these concerns dates back to ancient times. The founders of OpenAI, including Elon Musk, established this organization out of fear that the development of artificial intelligence would fall into the hands of companies like Google. They believe that these companies cannot handle this technology properly.
Read more: Space Summit: France and Germany Amidst a Space Crisis with the Absence of American Giants
Today, many individuals belonging to this group are themselves from within the tech industry or academia. In this regard, Dario Amodei, one of the founders of Anthropic, is recognized as a prominent representative in this field. He separated from OpenAI because he felt that the organization was not paying enough attention to the risks of this technology. This is despite the fact that he is currently developing advanced technologies, which has led some to accuse him of hypocrisy.
Support of the 'Boosters' for Technological Development
In contrast to the 'Doomers', there is a group of 'Boosters' who emphasize the necessity of technological advancement and its benefits for society. This group is particularly prominent in Silicon Valley and among venture capitalists. Individuals such as Marc Andreessen and David Sacks are recognized as influential figures in this area and are strongly opposed to any regulations that might slow down the pace of technological development.
This group criticizes the 'Doomers', arguing that they are actually representatives of companies seeking to use regulations to undermine their competitors. Garry Tan, the head of Y Combinator, is among those who are strongly opposed to safety regulations, viewing them as a threat to small companies.
The Position of Major Tech Companies
Many large tech companies are trying to act cautiously in this area and avoid political conflicts. At its inception, OpenAI was structured in such a way that researchers, not investors, would decide how to use the technology. However, under the leadership of Sam Altman, the company is now adopting more complex positions that address both the dangers of artificial intelligence and its rapid development and closeness to the U.S. government.
Companies like Google, Microsoft, and Amazon also have experience in this area and know how to engage in discussions about technology safety in Washington while trying to maintain minimal regulations. They are currently working cautiously on this issue.
Read more: Launching the European Digital Identity Wallet by the End of This Year · IFA Berlin 2026: Introduction of Smart Devices and Connected Innovations
